Binoculars for astronomy are best when they provide a low magnification, wide field of view. In addition to providing a substantial exit pupil of light leaving the eyepiece, when chosen at a weight of two pounds or less with fully coated surfaces, they can provide substantially more light reaching the user's eyes and assist in observing wide fields of much fainter objects than the naked eye can see.
This is NOT the thing one is supposed to do with a telescope. 40x to 50x are often the practical maximum magnifications, usually because of the unsteady atmosphere overhead. But the Moon is bright. The image doesn't get dim all that quickly. Plus, this was now a premium mirror - a .975 Strehl ratio. And it was fully-cooled, as it had been sitting outside for plenty of time to be at ambient temperature. So I said to myself, "Why not?"
Comparing and contrasting the benefits and features of a University Optics 6" mirror cell with a Meridian Telescopes mirror cell. What is good and bad about each one?
Comet Hergenrother is splitting apart," said Rachel Stevenson from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California. "Using the National Optical Astronomy Observatory's Gemini North Telescope on top of Mauna Kea, Hawaii, we have resolved that the nucleus of the comet has separated into at least four distinct pieces
I got my December issue of Astronomy Magazine the other day. I was pleasantly surprised to read that it wasn't just talking about the problem and lamenting the loss of dark skies, it was actually offering practical tips on light pollution reduction, like how to talk to neighbors about the problem - tactfully, since "light at night" can be an emotional issue related to fear / security. It also addressed how to retrofit existing lighting, so one need not buy all new lights to improve those already in place.
A question often asked on beginner forums or on reddit astronomy boards is, "What telescope should I get?" or "What is the best beginner telescope?" There's a helpful - if older - article from 2010 by Sky and Telescope that covers some (at the time) sub-$100 telescopes, all of which are more than that now by $10 to $30. That's a good place to start. But sometimes the budget is more (or less!). So what to do from there? There are SO many choice today, it's hard to know what to get. Here are some recommendations I think may help.
When deprived of artificial light and exposed to natural light/dark cycles, people sleep BETTER. We flood our nighttime environment with lighting - and I don't just mean outside. TV's, computers, light bulbs - sometimes on ALL night. And yet don't stop to consider that maybe we need to turn the lights off - like our ancestors did.
I was only 60% convinced I had seen an actual aurora, though my daughter, ever optimist, was 75% convinced (despite not having much of a passion for astronomy - okay, she doesn't have any at all, but she was excited about last night for some reason). When I got home, my conviction percentage dropped a bit as the area of brightening I saw was actually a brighter section of the Milky Way according to Stellarium. Fortunately, I got a couple responses to my post on CloudyNights.
I had made a video about how to find Pluto, and why this time was a good opportunity to try and spot the little pla... uhhh - dwarf planet. Two weeks ago some of my friends who are part of the informal Chicago Astronomer group indicated this last weekend might be a good time to try it. I put it on my calendar, and was not disappointed!
The 2012 Venus Transit turned out to be a perfect day for not only capturing the transit occurring visually via different means, but also sharing it with a LOT of interested local people.
How does one see - much less photograph - a solar eclipse when it is cloudy? Bring the right telescope of course - the "cloud clearing" one I own. The photos turned out okay too.
My technique is to use my finger to brace the camera over the eyepiece by placing said finger between the phone and eyepiece itself - just propping it up there. The phone initially thinks it's looking at darkness, so when I do finally manage to locate the Sun with the camera, the exposure gets 'blown out" for a few seconds until it can compensate for the brighter image. Then, I carefully control my breathing - sometimes I feel like a sniper - taking my shots by tapping the phone lightly to take the picture when the screen has a sharp image that isn't vibrating too much due to my finger being between the scope/camera
Afocal photography used to be "Hold a film camera to the eyepiece of your telescope and hope you get something good." With cell phone cameras, we can actually see what we are capturing right then and there - though, it does need to be VERY steady skies and a lot of magnification to get anything good.
Light. It either bounces around, is absorbed, or - as in most cases - there's a little bit of both happening. So what exactly has to occur for us to see the non-sunlit side of the Moon despite there not being any direct sunlight on it?
Space is big. REALLY big. In fact, it is a bit difficult to actually imagine just how big it is. And then I found a site where.... well, OMG. SPACE. It's big. REALLY big.
What can you see in a little Orion Funscope, with a 76mm primary mirror? Actually... quite a lot. This review discuss objects found and observed with this little - yet surprisingly powerful - tabletop telescope.
A review of the small tabletop telescope by Orion, the Funscope. Far more capable and worthy of consideration compared to the "department store" type telescopes of yesteryear. This review covers not only what makes this a worthy option, but also the downsides so you'll know the whole story.
Why do we light up the night sky above us, when the what we really need is light on the ground to see? Lighting up the night sky makes us all poorer in the form of throwing money up into the sky. That's not smart.
While the astronomy community may be small, many people have telescopes. If we help them discover more of what they can see, we can better address the issue of light pollution too.